CALIFORNIA & AD53's ECONOMY, TRADE & THE GLOBAL ECONOMY
A CURRENT MARKET OVERVIEW, ANALYSISAND 2009 SNAPSHOT
Related Story: US & California Economic Restructuring (3/07/09) |
![]() |
California is home to several significant economic regions with trade with virtually every country around the world. The economy of California is a dominant force in the economy of the United States, with California paying more to the federal system than it receives in direct monetary benefits.
Trade industries of central importances include:
In 2002, the U.S. government adopted an updated system of classifying economic activities (called the North America Industry Classification System, or NAICS), to better reflect today's economy.
In terms of jobs, the largest sectors in California's economy as of 2006 are:
In terms of output, the largest sectors are:
The 2008–2009 budget crisis in California is an ongoing fiscal crisis in which the state faces a budget shortfall of at least $11.2 billion,[1] projected to top $40 billion over the 2009–2010 fiscal years.[2] The budget crisis is a result of the larger subprime mortgage crisis and the economic crisis of 2008. On September 23, 2008, about 3 months after its due date, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed the 2008-2009 budget.[3][4] Worsening financial conditions that followed left the state with a large shortfall. A two-thirds vote is required to pass a budget, and in both the original budget negotiations and in the attempt to revise the budget no political party by itself had enough votes to pass a budget. The majority Democrats fought to minimize cuts to programs, while most of the minority Republicans refused to accept any tax increase. The original budget was put together by Democrats and some Republicans using spending cuts, internal borrowing, and accounting maneuvers.[3][4] On April 1, 2009 the state sales and use tax was temporarily increased by 1%.[5] Other state response to the crisis has included mandatory state employee furloughs and the delay of state tax refund payments.
International trade and
tourism
California has historically
derived significant revenue from international trade and
tourism. . However, the state's share of America's merchandise
export trade has been steadily shrinking since 2000, from 15.4%
to 11.1% in 2008. The exports of goods made in California
totaled $134 billion in 2007. $48 billion of that total was
computers and electronics, followed by transportation,
non-electrical machinery, agriculture, and chemicals. California
trade and exports translate into high-paying jobs for over one
million Californians. According to the U.S. Department of
Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, in 2005,
foreign-controlled companies employed 542,600 California
workers, the most of any state. Major sources of foreign
investment in California in 2005 were Japan, the United Kingdom,
Switzerland, France, and Germany. Foreign investment in
California was responsible for 4.2 percent of the state's total
private-industry employment in 2005.
]Total direct travel spending in
California reached $96.7 billion in 2007, a 3.6% increase over
the preceding year. Los Angeles County
receives the most tourism in the state.
Agriculture (including fruit, vegetables, dairy, and wine production) is a major California industry. In fact, California is the world's fifth largest supplier of food and agriculture commodities. Agriculture accounts for just slightly over 2% of California's $1.55 trillion gross state product.[citation needed] Airborne exports of perishable fruits and vegetables amounted to approximately $685 million in 2007.By way of comparison, California exported more agricultural products by air that year than 23 other states did by all modes of transport.
According to the California
Department of Food and Agriculture, "California agriculture is
nearly a $36.6 billion dollar industry that generates $100
billion in related economic activity." The state’s agricultural
sales first exceeded $30 billion 2004[12], making it more than
twice the size of any other state's agriculture industry.
California is the leading dairy state. Milk is California's number one farm commodity. California's dairy industry generated $47 billion "in economic activity" in 2004 and employed over 400,000 people."

Per capita personal income
Per capita personal income was
$38,956 as of 2006, ranking 11th in the nation. Per capita
income varies widely by geographic region and profession. The
Central Valley has the most extreme contrasts of income, with
migrant farm workers making less than minimum wage. While some
coastal cities include some of the wealthiest per-capita areas
in the U.S., notably La Jolla near San Diego, Beverly Hills, in
Los Angeles County, Newport Beach in Orange County in Southern
California, San Francisco and Marin County. The most expensive
and largest housing markets in the U.S. are in the state of
California, so there are a number of communities where average
housing prices hover between US$1–2 million. Generally, the
Central Valley in northern California is the least expensive
area, as is the Inland Empire in Southern California, though
prices in the Inland Empire, though falling, are still much
higher than the Central Valley, to the point that there are also
communities in this area where housing prices average around the
$1 million mark. The agricultural central counties have some of
the highest poverty rates in the U.S. The high-technology
sectors in Northern California, specifically Silicon Valley, in
Santa Clara and San Mateo counties, are currently emerging from
the economic downturn caused by the dot-com bust, which caused
the loss of over 250,000 jobs in Northern California alone.
Recent (Spring 2005) economic data indicates that economic
growth has resumed in California, although still slightly below
the national annualized forecast of 3.9%. The international boom
in housing prices has been most pronounced in California, with
the median property price in the state rising to about the
half-million dollar mark in April 2005.
Tax burden
Starting in April 2009 there will be
a new tax increase that is set to increase sales tax from 8.25%
to 9%+. In 2006 California's overall tax burden of $10.66
per $100 of personal income was slightly above the $10.43
average for the United States. In 2008, when measured as a
percentage of GDP, California had the 6th highest tax burden of
the fifty states.
Housing
The international boom in housing
prices has been most pronounced in California, with the median
property price in the state rising to about the half-million
dollar mark in April 2005. Orange County, Ventura County and the
San Francisco Bay Area have the highest median prices, each
approaching $650,000. The least expensive region is the Central
Valley, with a median price of $290,000.
"...It is now universally recognized that the U.S. economy is
experiencing a deep downturn unlike anything seen since the
1930s. Hence, the question continually arises: How close is this
to a depression? One way of answering is to look at the
unemployment rate. The Great Depression hit bottom in 1933 when
unemployment peaked at 25 percent. Today the United States is
losing jobs at the rate of 600,000 a month. But the official
unemployment rate currently stands at 8.1 percent (seasonally
adjusted, February 2009). This is the highest rate of official
unemployment in a quarter-century, but hardly what is considered
a depression-level rate, which is usually thought of as well
into the double-digits.
However, it is increasingly apparent that the official unemployment rate is much too conservative in its measure of labor underutilization, causing some of the better economic analysts to place their emphasis on the most inclusive unemployment rate provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), known as the U-6 measure, as opposed to U-3 (the official unemployment rate). U-6 is comprised of three components: (1) The “officially unemployed,” or U-3, those who are jobless and have looked for work in the past four weeks. Plus (2) “marginally attached workers,” or jobless individuals who desire employment and have looked in the past year but are not presently looking. (This includes as subcategories: [a] “discouraged workers” who consider the job market effectively closed to them; and [b] all other marginally attached workers, who often point to structural reasons for not pursuing employment, such as lack of childcare or transportation.) Plus (3) those “part time workers” who are part time for economic reasons and desire full-time employment. (John E. Bregger and Steven Haugen, “BLS Introduces a New Range of Alternative Unemployment Measures,” Monthly Labor Review 118, no. 10 [1995].)
The U-6 unemployment rate is currently at 16 percent (non-seasonally adjusted, February 2009) with that rate for men being 18%.
...The important fact is that although fluctuations in the unemployment and jobless rates for men followed each other closely until the 1980s, after that the unemployment rate fell while the jobless rate increased, widening the gap between the two. At present there is a 10 point gap between the two rates (with the unemployment rate for men in February 2009 at 8 percent and the jobless rate for men at 18 percent). This compares to about a 3 point separation between the unemployment and jobless rates for men in the mid-1970s. In fact, today’s jobless rate for men is currently 12 percentage points higher than it was in 1948 when it was only 6 percent.
The jobless rate for all workers (women as well as men) at present (February 2009) is 23 percent. ...
...Employers and government statisticians are mainly interested in how much slack there is in the economy and not in the level of human misery. Yet, a close examination reveals the depth of human misery as reflected in unemployment statistics is nonetheless profound. One out of every six workers is currently unemployed or underemployed according to the U-6 accounting. While close to one out of every four prime-age adults are jobless according to jobless rate calculations. Providing useful and (to the extent possible) rewarding employment for all is something that should be demanded of any economy. If the existing system cannot provide this, then reason and morality suggest that the underlying population should rise up and replace it with one that can.
— (Monthly Review, March 6, 2009)